stephenbrooks.orgForumMuon1GeneralHigh-res scan project
Username: Password:
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Search site:
Subscribe to thread via RSS
[DPC]white_panther
2010-10-12 11:02:38
0-29 RGtx
30-59 [dpc]white_panther
60-89 K`Tetch
90-119 [dpc]white_panther
120-149 RGtx
150-179 [dpc]white_panther
180-209
210-239
240-269
270-299 Stephen Brooks
300-319 tomaz
320-339 tomaz
340-359
360-379 Boots
380-399
400-419
420-439 Cameron
440-459
460-479 tomaz
480-499 tomaz
500-549 tomaz
550-599
600-649
650-699
700-749
750-799
800-849
850-899
900-949 Stephen Brooks
950-999 Hydrox
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-14 15:56:21
These take a while!  I'm doing 927 out of the 900-949 range on my work quad-core Xeon.
Maniacken [US-Distributed]
2010-10-14 17:21:20
Just a progress update.
Maniacken 000-250 Complete.
K`Tetch
2010-10-14 21:40:40
huh maniacken?  what 0-250?  it's not on the list.

As an update, i've done 13 of my block of 30. I've put it on hold for now, to concentrate on the new mainstream lattice (i'll continue things there on that thread)
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-14 23:47:16
He's doing ALL the results, in parallel with everyone else.
[DPC]white_panther
2010-10-15 11:17:44
0-29 RGtx
30-59 [dpc]white_panther
60-89 K`Tetch
90-119 [dpc]white_panther
120-149 RGtx
150-179 [dpc]white_panther
180-209 [dpc]white_panther
210-239
240-269
270-299 Stephen Brooks
300-319 tomaz
320-339 tomaz
340-359
360-379 Boots
380-399
400-419
420-439 Cameron
440-459
460-479 tomaz
480-499 tomaz
500-549 tomaz
550-599
600-649
650-699
700-749
750-799
800-849
850-899
900-949 Stephen Brooks
950-999 Hydrox
Boots
2010-10-15 12:00:46
Boots 380-399
[Edited by Boots at 2010-10-15 12:01:18]
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-15 12:07:25
Here is the graph of the _axial3 scan so far:



Notice my 270-299 block has less variance than the rest?  It was calculated using the version 4.44e that I retracted because people complained it was "slow". Or more accurately, it was compiled with the current development source of Muon1 that I believe hasn't changed a lot since v4.44e. Soon I'm going to have to find out what changed between 'd' and 'e' (at some stage I added a more accurate collision detection routine, for instance).
Cameron
2010-10-15 21:50:59
Returning 420-439
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-18 14:04:13
I've updated the graph above with the recent 2 submissions.  Errr, make that three submissions because my 900-949 block had completed.

Taking 240-269.
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-18 16:09:12
Received 380-399 from Boots, also coloured the results done with v4.44e by me in purple.
Maniacken [US-Distributed]
2010-10-19 00:07:07
Im up to 400 now.

Stephen did you want me to send intermittant results?
And if so where should i send them?
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-19 12:50:12
Intermittent results?  I'd rather have consistent results. 
RGtx
2010-10-19 14:47:45
Results 120-149 returned.
210-239 Taken.
Maniacken [US-Distributed]
2010-10-19 15:53:40
Ok ill wait till i have 000-999 done to send in any results.
Was uncertain if you could use results faster.  aka send in 000-500 and then 501-999.
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-19 20:09:19
Well, I'll construct the first graph in pieces and then when you have the whole set, overlay that to check they are consistent.
K`Tetch
2010-10-19 21:42:57
60-89 sent (had a problem and lost the first 5 results, had to do them again)
Boots
2010-10-20 00:58:34
0-29 RGtx
30-59 [dpc]white_panther
60-89 K`Tetch
90-119 [dpc]white_panther
120-149 RGtx
150-179 [dpc]white_panther
180-209 [dpc]white_panther
210-239
240-269 Stephen Brooks
270-299 Stephen Brooks
300-319 tomaz
320-339 tomaz
340-359
360-379 Boots
380-399 Boots
400-419 Boots
420-439 Cameron
440-459
460-479 tomaz
480-499 tomaz
500-549 tomaz
550-599
600-649
650-699
700-749
750-799
800-849
850-899
900-949 Stephen Brooks
950-999 Hydrox
RGtx
2010-10-20 01:38:05
0-29 RGtx
30-59 [dpc]white_panther
60-89 K`Tetch
90-119 [dpc]white_panther
120-149 RGtx
150-179 [dpc]white_panther
180-209 [dpc]white_panther
210-239 RGtx
240-269 Stephen Brooks
270-299 Stephen Brooks
300-319 tomaz
320-339 tomaz
340-359
360-379 Boots
380-399 Boots
400-419 Boots
420-439 Cameron
440-459
460-479 tomaz
480-499 tomaz
500-549 tomaz
550-599
600-649
650-699
700-749
750-799
800-849
850-899
900-949 Stephen Brooks
950-999 Hydrox
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-20 10:53:24
I've updated the graph to include some K'tetch results.
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-21 13:49:59
...and some from white_panther (180-209).
[DPC] Mr. Aldi
2010-10-21 21:53:12
Hello,

My i7 is running standard client now, but I guess this should be more fun

0-29 RGtx
30-59 [dpc]white_panther
60-89 K`Tetch
90-119 [dpc]white_panther
120-149 RGtx
150-179 [dpc]white_panther
180-209 [dpc]white_panther
210-239 RGtx
240-269 Stephen Brooks
270-299 Stephen Brooks
300-319 tomaz
320-339 tomaz
340-359
360-379 Boots
380-399 Boots
400-419 Boots
420-439 Cameron
440-459
460-479 tomaz
480-499 tomaz
500-549 tomaz
550-599 [DPC] Mr.  Aldi
600-649
650-699
700-749
750-799
800-849
850-899
900-949 Stephen Brooks
950-999 Hydrox
[DPC] Mr. Aldi
2010-10-21 22:24:07
Oops, was running scan 1. Might want to take that offline
K`Tetch
2010-10-22 00:56:42
As stephen already said, Mr Aldi, I've returned my block (working on new designs for the new lattice now)
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-22 01:05:13
If you want to run scan 1, try taking 100-199 or 200-299 from this directory because the people running those blocks seem to have disappeared.
[DPC] Mr. Aldi
2010-10-22 02:09:56
@K`Tetch, I took 550-599 of scan 1 first, but found that out and took the queue file from 2nd scan.  I will now take 100-199 from scan 1.

550-599 is up for grabs
[Edited by [DPC] Mr. Aldi at 2010-10-22 02:11:53]
Haiya-Dragon
2010-10-22 12:15:20
Taking 440-459
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-22 14:14:28
Just received 100-199 from the *first* scan from Eveiga - at least I know where that one went.  Mr Aldi might be better trying 200-299. The remaining gap is 950-974, which is on my laptop at home and I will add it to the graph on Monday.
[DPC] Mr. Aldi
2010-10-22 16:08:50
Ok, 200-299 running now.  Let me see if I can produce a new optimum (or so)
[Edited by [DPC] Mr. Aldi at 2010-10-22 16:09:26]
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-22 22:02:51
I just extracted my own 950-974 scan1 results from my results.dat file because I stupidly left it running, it finished the queue and carried on doing random ones, then sent all the results.
Boots
2010-10-23 14:29:17
Hello,

My i7 is running standard client now, but I guess this should be more fun

0-29 RGtx
30-59 [dpc]white_panther
60-89 K`Tetch
90-119 [dpc]white_panther
120-149 RGtx
150-179 [dpc]white_panther
180-209 [dpc]white_panther
210-239 RGtx
240-269 Stephen Brooks
270-299 Stephen Brooks
300-319 tomaz
320-339 tomaz
340-359 Boots
360-379 Boots
380-399 Boots
400-419 Boots
420-439 Cameron
440-459
460-479 tomaz
480-499 tomaz
500-549 tomaz
550-599
600-649
650-699
700-749
750-799
800-849
850-899
900-949 Stephen Brooks
950-999 Hydrox
Boots
2010-10-23 14:30:57
Taken 320-339
Boots

Sent 400-419
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-23 14:55:45
You mean you've taken 340-359?
Boots
2010-10-24 00:40:03
Sorry!  Yes.
[DPC]white_panther
2010-10-24 12:36:13
[quote]
Notice my 270-299 block has less variance than the rest?  It was calculated using the version 4.44e that I retracted because people complained it was "slow". Or more accurately, it was compiled with the current development source of Muon1 that I believe hasn't changed a lot since v4.44e. Soon I'm going to have to find out what changed between 'd' and 'e' (at some stage I added a more accurate collision detection routine, for instance).
[/quote]

I've done a few tests with v4.44e and compare them with the v4.44d results, but I only found a small difference.
with an average of 0.002525 higher than the "d" version is a bit higher, but not like the results of you.

Here is the excel file containing all data.

ps.  this is on the Linac900Ext10d2 lattice because the e version is realy, realy slow (860 vs 495 kpts/sec)

[Edited by [DPC]white_panther at 2010-10-24 12:42:35]
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-24 18:17:48
I guess that means v4.44e differs from my "development" version.  I've got a historical log of the source code so can look for changes between the various release dates next week.  (This may eventually lead into semi-public alpha testing come December).
[DPC]white_panther
2010-10-25 00:35:48
0-29 RGtx
30-59 [dpc]white_panther
60-89 K`Tetch
90-119 [dpc]white_panther
120-149 RGtx
150-179 [dpc]white_panther
180-209 [dpc]white_panther
210-239 RGtx
240-269 Stephen Brooks
270-299 Stephen Brooks
300-319 tomaz
320-339 tomaz
340-359 Boots
360-379 Boots
380-399 Boots
400-419 Boots
420-439 Cameron
440-459 [DPC]white_panther
460-479 tomaz
480-499 tomaz
500-549 tomaz
550-599
600-649
650-699
700-749
750-799
800-849
850-899
900-949 Stephen Brooks
950-999 Hydrox

taken 440-459
Haiya-Dragon
2010-10-25 09:55:37
Sent 440-459..
White Panther, I stated I claimed 440-459 a few days ago, so you might want to take a different range there..

Taking 550-599 now
[DPC]white_panther
2010-10-25 11:55:36
0-29 RGtx
30-59 [dpc]white_panther
60-89 K`Tetch
90-119 [dpc]white_panther
120-149 RGtx
150-179 [dpc]white_panther
180-209 [dpc]white_panther
210-239 RGtx
240-269 Stephen Brooks
270-299 Stephen Brooks
300-319 tomaz
320-339 tomaz
340-359 Boots
360-379 Boots
380-399 Boots
400-419 Boots
420-439 Cameron
440-459 Haiya-Dragon
460-479 tomaz
480-499 tomaz
500-549 tomaz
550-599 Haiya-Dragon
600-649 [dpc]white_panther
650-699
700-749
750-799
800-849
850-899
900-949 Stephen Brooks
950-999 Hydrox

taken 600-649
[DPC] Mr. Aldi
2010-10-26 01:10:53
200-299 scan 1 sent

Vaio takes 650-699 (done by Sunday), i7 700-749.

0-29 RGtx
30-59 [dpc]white_panther
60-89 K`Tetch
90-119 [dpc]white_panther
120-149 RGtx
150-179 [dpc]white_panther
180-209 [dpc]white_panther
210-239 RGtx
240-269 Stephen Brooks
270-299 Stephen Brooks
300-319 tomaz
320-339 tomaz
340-359 Boots
360-379 Boots
380-399 Boots
400-419 Boots
420-439 Cameron
440-459 Haiya-Dragon
460-479 tomaz
480-499 tomaz
500-549 tomaz
550-599 Haiya-Dragon
600-649 [dpc]white_panther
650-699 [DPC] Mr. Aldi
700-749 [DPC] Mr. Aldi
750-799
800-849
850-899
900-949 Stephen Brooks
950-999 Hydrox
Boots
2010-10-26 01:14:08
340-359 Sent

0-29 RGtx
30-59 [dpc]white_panther
60-89 K`Tetch
90-119 [dpc]white_panther
120-149 RGtx
150-179 [dpc]white_panther
180-209 [dpc]white_panther
210-239 RGtx
240-269 Stephen Brooks
270-299 Stephen Brooks
300-319 tomaz
320-339 tomaz
340-359 Boots
360-379 Boots
380-399 Boots
400-419 Boots
420-439 Cameron
440-459 Haiya-Dragon
460-479 tomaz
480-499 tomaz
500-549 tomaz
550-599 Haiya-Dragon
600-649 [dpc]white_panther
650-699 [DPC] Mr. Aldi
700-749 [DPC] Mr. Aldi
750-799
800-849
850-899 Boots
900-949 Stephen Brooks
950-999 Hydrox
[DPC] Mr. Aldi
2010-10-26 10:41:19


That is going to take a little longer like this with 5 runs?!  About 20 days when running 24h on a mobile i7 and 10 days on a i7 920...

Is there some setting wrong?
[Edited by [DPC] Mr. Aldi at 2010-10-26 10:45:39]
[DPC]white_panther
2010-10-26 13:19:55
just stop the client and put:
sb9r=349;sb9l=647;sb9f=932;sb8r=426;sb8l=149;sb8f=390;sb7r=797;sb7l=295;sb7f=945;sb6r=797;sb6l=295;sb6f=945;sb5r=724;sb5l=457;sb5f=618;sb4r=974;sb4l=049;sb4f=670;sb3r=000;sb3l=999;sb3f=187;sb2r=000;sb2l=999;sb2f=990;sb1r=000;sb1l=631;sb1f=103;sb10r=096;sb10l=647;sb10f=932;s2r=234;s2l=992;s2f=000;s1l=999;s1f=996;rf9v=235;rf9p=000;rf8v=715;rf8p=118;rf7v=571;rf7p=688;rf6v=043;rf6p=583;rf5v=604;rf5p=940;rf4v=991;rf4p=849;rf3v=918;rf3p=702;rf2v=537;rf2p=000;rf1v=992;rf1p=809;rf10v=926;rf10p=855;ls9l=992;ls9f=000;ls8l=431;ls8f=000;ls7l=629;ls7f=995;ls6l=875;ls6f=036;ls5l=490;ls5f=997;ls4l=761;ls4f=999;ls3l=991;ls3f=984;ls2l=898;ls2f=997;ls1l=992;ls1f=000;ls10l=999;ls10f=000;linaccells=997;ld9=509;ld8=231;ld7=751;ld6=999;ld5=048;ld4=483;ld3=552;ld2=480;ld10=000;ld1=000;decaycells=018;db9l=000;db8l=255;db7l=817;db6l=734;db5l=178;db4l=403;db3l=400;db2l=137;db1l=446;db10l=097;d4l=679;d5l=679;d3l=958;d2l=169;d1l=449;tantalumrodz=222;tantalumrodr=000;#runs=5;
2.489781 (38278.4 Mpts) [v4.44d] <Linac900Ext10d2_axial3> {B26F6D6E110EF2639F253DED}

in the results.dat
restart the client, and you don't have the 5 times run
[DPC] Mr. Aldi
2010-10-26 14:19:20
Aargh!  Dank je!  xD
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-26 16:05:01
I've added the results I've received recently to the graph - first the old scan, which is complete:



Below is the second scan:


Stephen Brooks
2010-10-26 17:52:04
Done 240-269 and added it to the second graph.  Taking 750-799.

0-29 RGtx
30-59 [dpc]white_panther
60-89 K`Tetch
90-119 [dpc]white_panther
120-149 RGtx
150-179 [dpc]white_panther
180-209 [dpc]white_panther
210-239 RGtx
240-269 Stephen Brooks
270-299 Stephen Brooks
300-319 tomaz
320-339 tomaz
340-359 Boots
360-379 Boots
380-399 Boots
400-419 Boots
420-439 Cameron
440-459 Haiya-Dragon
460-479 tomaz
480-499 tomaz
500-549 tomaz
550-599 Haiya-Dragon
600-649 [dpc]white_panther
650-699 [DPC] Mr. Aldi
700-749 [DPC] Mr. Aldi
750-799 Stephen Brooks
800-849
850-899 Boots
900-949 Stephen Brooks
950-999 Hydrox
[DPC] Mr. Aldi
2010-10-26 18:50:04
The results from the 2nd scan is almost the same as from the first.  Only your results are with much less variance, Stephen.  But also notice that it looks like 'purple' wants to follow a line with different slope.
Stephen Brooks
2010-10-27 16:51:26
More of the 2nd scan has been filled in (refresh the picture).  As Mr. Aldi says, it's noticeable that the "random" variation of the results appears to be the same, for the most part, in both lattices, so the fluctuations must come from another source than just the number of particles.
[DPC] Mr. Aldi
2010-10-27 18:32:18
Could you send me 4.44e?  I would like to try a queue with steps of 10 (steps of 30 from 800-1000).  Then we can already see what the curve with 4.44e would look like.  If this is of interest to you.
Maniacken [US-Distributed]
2010-10-27 18:53:36
Progress report
Maniacken 000-750 complete
: contact : - - -
E-mail: sbstrudel characterstephenbrooks.orgTwitter: stephenjbrooksMastodon: strudel charactersjbstrudel charactermstdn.io RSS feed

Site has had 22021124 accesses.